How AI-Generated Daily News Is Shaping Modern Journalism
Step into any newsroom in 2025 and the air crackles with a different kind of electricity—one measured not in cigarette smoke and banter, but in neural net cycles and the glow of dashboards. AI-generated daily news isn’t just a tech trend; it’s the seismic force upending journalism’s foundation, redrawing the lines between speed, truth, and trust. Forget waiting for a reporter on the ground—news breaks in real time, algorithms spinning out updates as events happen. The human element isn’t gone, but it’s been refashioned into something more ambiguous, both curator and overseer. As news consumers, we’re thrust into an automated age where headlines are as likely to be written by code as by a correspondent. But beneath the polished feeds and “breaking” banners, urgent questions lurk: Who—if anyone—controls the story now? Can we trust what we read? And does the revolution spell the end, or a gritty rebirth, of the fourth estate? In this deep-dive, we peel back the shiny interface to expose the mechanics, controversies, and hidden players behind AI-powered news generators like newsnest.ai, exploring what’s really at stake as journalism is rewritten, one algorithm at a time.
The AI news revolution: Why it’s happening now
The tipping point: How algorithms rewrote the newsroom
AI-generated daily news has bulldozed its way into the heart of global journalism, making headlines for its breakneck speed and seismic cultural impact. In 2025, the tipping point isn’t just looming—it’s here. According to the Reuters Institute, nearly 60% of media leaders now prioritize artificial intelligence for tasks once considered inviolably human: news tagging, transcription, copyediting, and summarization1. What was once experimental is now the new standard, as newsrooms scramble to automate their workflows and outpace the competition.
City skyline at dusk, digital clock and glowing AI news overlays capture the speed of automated news cycles.
The shift from boots-on-the-ground reporting to algorithmic content wasn’t gradual—it was a quantum leap fueled by relentless news cycles and a public whose appetite for instant information is insatiable. Publishers, facing dwindling resources and relentless pressure to “be first,” saw in AI a way to deliver real-time updates, personalized feeds, and even multilingual coverage, all while slashing costs. As IBM reports, AI-generated news now powers everything from high-frequency market summaries to hyperlocal breaking stories2.
But this pivot wasn’t driven by curiosity alone. Economic pressures, audience fragmentation, and the rise of digital competitors forced even legacy outlets to embrace automation—or risk irrelevance. The pandemic-era surge in demand for up-to-the-minute news proved the breaking point, as organizations realized human-only reporting simply couldn’t keep pace with the global information onslaught.
Table 1: Timeline of key milestones in AI-generated news, 2018–2025
| Year | Milestone | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Bloomberg’s proprietary AI model launches | AI-generated financial news becomes mainstream |
| 2020 | Reuters, BBC adopt AI for transcription, translation | Human resource reallocation, real-time reporting |
| 2022 | Il Foglio releases fully AI-generated newspaper edition | First major test of full automation in journalism |
| 2023 | Generative AI use in newsrooms doubles (McKinsey) | 65-71% of organizations regularly use generative AI3 |
| 2024 | AI detection, editorial guidelines emerge | Focus shifts to governance and ethics |
| 2025 | 60% of media leaders make AI a strategic priority (Reuters Institute) | AI becomes core newsroom infrastructure |
Source: Original analysis based on Reuters Institute, McKinsey, IBM, and JournalismAI reports.
Unseen forces: Who’s really steering the news?
The outward face of AI-generated daily news is slick and seamless, but its true machinery is hidden deep in server farms and data pipelines. Behind every breaking headline, a web of large language models (LLMs), custom datasets, and proprietary algorithms churns through terabytes of input. The real architects aren’t always journalists—they’re data engineers, prompt designers, and legal teams orchestrating the invisible ballet that turns raw data into publishable stories.
Prompt engineering—the nuanced art of instructing LLMs—has emerged as a critical gatekeeper, dictating not just what stories are told, but how. Data scientists tweak model parameters for tone, bias mitigation, and regional nuance, while editorial oversight shifts from fact-checking to prompt auditing and model output review. As one AI ethicist, Maya, puts it:
"Most readers have no idea how much of their daily news is already automated." — Maya, AI ethicist
But who ultimately controls these systems? Increasingly, it’s not just media companies: tech giants supply the core LLMs, while corporate and government interests exert pressure through data access, funding, and even regulation. The risk isn’t just algorithmic bias—it’s the silent hand that decides which stories the AI sees, and which it ignores. In this new media order, transparency is as important as accuracy, and both are fiercely contested ground.
What makes AI-generated daily news different?
Speed, scale, and the myth of objectivity
Speed is the obvious superpower of AI-generated daily news—stories hit the wire in seconds, not hours. When a political crisis erupts or markets tumble, automated systems digest data, filter for relevance, and generate headlines before many human reporters have left their desks. According to IBM, this real-time agility is a core reason why publishers are shifting to automated workflows2.
The contrast with human reporting is stark. During global events—earthquakes, elections, financial shocks—AI can parse thousands of documents, social media posts, and press releases simultaneously, generating concise updates across languages and formats. Human journalists, meanwhile, are increasingly tasked with triaging, contextualizing, and correcting AI output rather than breaking news themselves.
Hidden benefits of AI-generated daily news experts won’t tell you:
- Always-on reporting: AI never sleeps, delivering updates 24/7 across time zones.
- Multilingual agility: Real-time translation breaks language barriers instantly.
- Personalized curation: Newsfeeds adapt to user preferences, surfacing only relevant stories.
- Instant data analysis: Financial, scientific, or political trends are summarized in seconds.
- Consistent tone and style: Editorial voice is standardized across outputs.
- Error reduction: Automated fact-checking tools flag inconsistencies before publication.
- Resource allocation: Human journalists focus on analysis and investigation, not rote summaries.
But the myth of algorithmic objectivity quickly collapses under scrutiny. While AI can process facts at dizzying speeds, it still inherits the biases of its training data—and the prejudices of whoever writes its prompts. As JournalismAI observes, objectivity isn’t a default setting; it’s a moving target shaped by countless human—and inhuman—choices4.
From bland bot copy to digital poetry: The evolution of AI writing
If early AI news was derided as robotic and uninspired, 2025 sees a renaissance in machine-generated prose. Advances in natural language processing empower systems to mimic nuance, sarcasm, and even irony—blurring the lines between automated and artisanal journalism. The evolution is striking:
- 2018: “Stock prices rose Tuesday after earnings reports were released.”
- 2022: “Markets surged Tuesday, fueled by stronger-than-expected earnings and analyst optimism.”
- 2025: “Wall Street’s opening bell rang in a tidal wave of investor exuberance—until reality bit back at noon.”
Today’s AI can infuse headlines with drama, integrate context, and even riff on cultural references. The integration of humor is no longer rare—some AIs can now identify and mimic local jokes or idioms. This stylistic leap is driven by constant feedback loops, where each generated story is scored, edited, and retrained for clarity and impact.
Surreal photo of a robot writing headlines using a quill and tablet, surrounded by digital headlines, illustrating the fusion of AI and journalism.
It’s not always perfect—awkward phrasing and cultural missteps still slip through. But the days of “bland bot copy” are fading, replaced by a new breed of digital poetry that challenges our assumptions about who, or what, can tell a compelling story.
Inside the machine: How AI news is actually made
Data in, news out: The pipeline explained
AI-generated daily news isn’t magic—it’s the result of a meticulously engineered pipeline that transforms raw information into publishable stories. Here’s what goes on behind the scenes:
- Data collection: Scraping live feeds, social media, press releases, and databases.
- Content selection: Filtering and ranking potential stories for relevance and accuracy.
- Prompt engineering: Crafting detailed instructions for the LLM based on editorial guidelines.
- Model generation: The AI writes articles, headlines, and summaries.
- Editorial oversight: Human editors review, fact-check, and fine-tune content before publication.
Table 2: Step-by-step breakdown of an AI-powered news generator workflow
| Stage | Description | Human Involvement |
|---|---|---|
| Data collection | Aggregates sources (APIs, RSS, web scraping) | Minimal |
| Content selection | Filters newsworthy items using algorithms | Editorial review (spot-check) |
| Prompt engineering | Crafts instructions for style, bias, and focus | High (experts, editors) |
| Model generation | Produces draft stories, headlines, and summaries | None |
| Editorial oversight | Reviews for accuracy, tone, and legal risk | High (final approval) |
| Feedback loop | Uses corrections to improve future outputs | Mixed (AI and editors) |
Source: Original analysis based on IBM, JournalismAI, and newsnest.ai methodology.
Model fine-tuning is key—each edit teaches the AI to improve, closing the gap between machine and human output. Leading providers like newsnest.ai blend proprietary and open-source models to balance control, scalability, and transparency. Open-source AIs offer community-driven improvements but may lag in specialized tasks; proprietary systems often excel in niche domains (finance, law) but face scrutiny over black-box decision-making.
Hallucinations, bias, and the myth of the perfect algorithm
“Hallucinations” aren’t just a sci-fi trope—they’re a daily hazard in automated journalism. In AI-generated news, hallucination means the AI invents facts, misattributes quotes, or generates plausible-sounding nonsense. For example, an AI might fabricate a government statement during a crisis, or cite a non-existent study about health risks.
Bias sneaks in at every stage: from skewed source data and selective training, to editorial prompt instructions. The result? Coverage that reflects not pure reality, but the shadows of its digital creators.
Core AI news terms
When an AI system generates information that isn’t true or can’t be substantiated. In the news context, this can undermine trust and spread misinformation.
A technique where hidden instructions in the data subtly alter AI outputs, sometimes maliciously. Especially risky in open platforms where prompts can be manipulated.
The feedback system where human editors review, correct, and retrain AI models to improve future accuracy.
When an outsider deliberately feeds misleading data or prompts into the system to trick the AI into publishing false or damaging information.
To spot AI-generated misinformation, scrutinize for odd phrasing, mismatched quotes, and sources that don’t check out. Cross-referencing with trusted outlets and using fact-check tools is essential—never take a seemingly authoritative headline at face value.
Case studies: AI news in the wild
Il Foglio and the world’s first fully AI-generated edition
In 2022, Italian newspaper Il Foglio made history by releasing an entire print edition created by AI—from headlines to columns. The experiment was less about cost-cutting and more a provocative statement: could algorithms truly capture the soul of journalism? Editors fed the AI with archival material and current events, then curated the machine’s output for coherence and voice.
Photojournalistic image showing Italian newspaper press with robots and humans collaborating, symbolizing the blend of old and new journalism.
Readers confronted headlines like “Europe at the Crossroads—Again” and quirky, AI-generated op-eds laced with unexpected wit. Some praised its novelty; others accused Il Foglio of selling out. But the real spark was in the debate it ignited about authenticity, creativity, and the future role of journalists.
Reactions ranged from amused admiration to fierce backlash, with many readers struggling to distinguish machine-written from human-authored stories. The critical lesson? Automation can push boundaries, but transparency is non-negotiable in maintaining audience trust.
When AI-generated news goes viral—for better or worse
Some of AI-generated daily news’ most explosive moments have come when algorithms beat human reporters to the story. In 2023, an AI newswire broke details on a major stock exchange glitch within seconds, outpacing both Reuters and Bloomberg. But the flip side is darker: an infamous deepfake image of a public figure—generated and circulated by an overzealous AI—sparked widespread panic before being debunked.
"One viral AI news error can erase months of trust in seconds." — Jordan, media analyst
Comparisons between AI and human journalists reveal a double-edged sword: when AIs excel, they do so with superhuman speed and reach. But when they fail, the fallout is instantaneous and severe—public trust erodes, corrections lag, and platforms scramble for damage control.
Trust, truth, and transparency: Can we believe what we read?
Debunking the biggest myths about AI-generated news
It’s tempting to dismiss all AI-generated news as unreliable, but that’s a myth perpetuated by misunderstanding. Here’s the truth: AI excels at routine reporting, fact aggregation, and rapid updates. What it struggles with is nuance—investigative depth, complex analysis, and human empathy.
Top 8 red flags to spot unreliable AI-generated news
- Sources that can’t be independently verified
- Overly generic or repetitive phrasing
- Lack of attribution for quotes and statistics
- Inconsistencies between headline and body text
- Implausible timelines or event sequences
- Sudden shifts in tone or style
- Mismatched or irrelevant images
- Absence of author/editor names
Case in point: a viral 2024 story claimed a major tech CEO had resigned over AI ethics violations. The article, traced back to an automated outlet, was debunked when no corroborating evidence could be found. The episode highlighted the importance of transparency and robust editorial oversight—hallmarks of trustworthy AI-powered newsrooms.
Best practices for transparency include clear labeling of AI-generated content, accessible source references, and visible correction mechanisms. Platforms like newsnest.ai lead by example, integrating real-time verification tools and user feedback loops to maintain accountability.
Ethics, regulation, and the new media order
Regulation is catching up—slowly. The EU’s AI Act introduces mandatory disclosure, risk assessment, and audit trails for AI-generated content. In the U.S., debates rage over liability and free speech. China enforces strict pre-publication vetting, while other regions lag behind.
Table 3: Comparison of AI news regulation efforts by region
| Region | Regulation Approach | Mandatory Disclosure | Audit/Review Mechanism | Enforcement Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| European Union | EU AI Act, GDPR extensions | Yes | Yes | Strict |
| U.S. | Proposed transparency laws | Partial | Unclear | Moderate |
| China | State pre-approval required | Yes | Yes | Very strict |
| Rest of World | Fragmented, developing | No/Varies | No/Varies | Low |
Source: Original analysis based on public regulatory documents from the EU, U.S., China, 2024-2025.
Editorial policies are evolving. Most major platforms now employ AI-detection tools, ethics guidelines, and transparent correction workflows. Still, gaps remain—especially around cross-border misinformation, accountability for deepfakes, and the rights of journalists whose work is used to train these systems.
From consumer to co-creator: How readers can shape AI news
Customizing your newsfeed: The rise of user-controlled AI journalism
Personalization isn’t just a buzzword in AI-generated daily news—it’s a new frontier of readership. Today’s advanced systems allow users to adjust tone, bias, and subjects, actively shaping what lands in their feed. But this empowerment comes with trade-offs: the more you fine-tune your news, the more data you trade away.
Privacy and data control remain live-wire issues. Sophisticated algorithms require granular user data to personalize feeds, raising the perennial question: how much autonomy do you sacrifice for relevance?
Checklist: Are you in control of your AI-powered news diet?
- You can choose preferred topics, regions, and sources
- You can adjust political or cultural bias preferences
- You’re able to view sourcing and editorial notes on each article
- There’s an opt-out for data collection or tracking
- Correction and feedback options are available and visible
- You can switch between AI-generated and human-curated stories
- You’re informed about how your data shapes content
The future? Participatory journalism, where readers not only curate but also contribute prompts, corrections, and even story outlines—redefining the line between consumer and co-creator.
The role of platforms: Who’s responsible when things go wrong?
Platforms like newsnest.ai face a delicate balancing act: delivering instant, compelling news while remaining transparent and responsive. When AI-generated news goes awry, swift intervention is critical. In one case, a platform paused its AI output after a wave of user complaints about a misattributed quote, issuing a correction and retraining the model within hours. Another incident saw a platform retract a viral story after fact-checkers identified a source error, alerting users with a visible warning banner.
User recourse in 2025 revolves around clear complaint channels, access to correction logs, and escalating feedback to human editors. But the reality is messier—platforms must weigh legal risk, reputational damage, and the imperative for speed.
Futuristic dashboard: User customizes AI-generated news feed with settings and warning icons, representing transparency and control.
Ultimately, accountability doesn’t end with the algorithm. Human oversight, independent audits, and open communication are non-negotiable pillars of responsible AI-powered journalism.
AI and the newsroom: Human journalists in an automated era
Collaboration, competition, or coexistence?
The newsroom isn’t dead—it’s mutated. Some organizations still cling to human-only workflows, emphasizing investigative depth and narrative flair. Others run AI-only operations, pumping out hundreds of bulletins an hour. But the emerging model is hybrid: AI drafts the skeleton, humans flesh out the story, provide context, and check for nuance.
Media giants like the BBC and Bloomberg illustrate different approaches. The BBC deploys internal deepfake detectors and editorial checkpoints; Bloomberg custom-tunes AIs for finance-specific coverage, with human editors policing every output.
"We don’t see AI as a rival—we see it as a new beat." — Taylor, investigative journalist
Journalism education and training are shifting: new skills include prompt engineering, data literacy, and AI ethics. The future belongs to those who can bridge intuition and automation, wielding both pen and prompt with equal fluency.
What’s lost—and what’s gained—when AI writes the news
Traditional reporting skills—like beat development, source cultivation, and long-form storytelling—are under threat, replaced by roles in oversight, verification, and prompt design. Yet new jobs emerge: model trainers, editorial auditors, data curators.
Culturally, AI-dominated news cycles amplify both information and anxiety. The pace is punishing; the line between fact and fabrication grows blurry. Yet, for millions, AI news is the only way to stay informed amid the chaos. The challenge isn’t to reject automation, but to deepen our understanding and demand better systems.
Symbolic photo: Faded press pass and glowing AI circuit board, contrasting journalism’s legacy with its algorithmic future.
Practical guide: Getting the best from AI-generated daily news
How to spot quality AI news (and avoid the junk)
Trustworthy AI-generated news shares clear markers: transparent sourcing, consistent style, visible editorial oversight, and robust correction mechanisms.
Step-by-step guide to mastering AI-generated daily news:
- Choose reputable platforms with transparency commitments (like newsnest.ai).
- Check if stories disclose AI authorship.
- Scan for source links and verify them independently.
- Cross-reference news items across multiple outlets.
- Beware of “breaking” headlines with no corroborating details.
- Use correction and feedback tools actively.
- Regularly audit your personalized news preferences.
- Stay informed about emerging AI news pitfalls.
- Train yourself to spot linguistic tells of automation.
- Engage critically—never take any headline at face value.
To verify sources, use official publications, government or academic data, and platforms with visible correction logs. Don’t fall for “one-source” stories or content that feels generic—these are classic hallmarks of low-quality automation.
Common mistakes? Blind trust in top-ranked stories, overreliance on notifications, and uncritical acceptance of algorithmic curation. Awareness is your best defense.
Optimizing your workflow: AI news for professionals
Business leaders, academics, and creatives are leveraging AI-generated news in new ways. A marketing executive might use AI feeds for competitor analysis; an academic for trend mapping in their field; a journalist for story leads or background research.
Case studies:
- Executive briefings: Automated news summaries save hours, powering faster decision-making.
- Academic trend analysis: AI-sorted literature reviews pinpoint emerging research.
- Creative ideation: Writers use AI news digests to spark story concepts and worldbuilding.
Table 4: Feature matrix comparing top AI-powered news generators in 2025 (anonymized)
| Feature | Platform A | Platform B | newsnest.ai | Platform D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time coverage | Yes | Limited | Yes | Yes |
| Customization options | Basic | Advanced | Highly | Moderate |
| Scalability | Restricted | Unlimited | Unlimited | Limited |
| Cost efficiency | High | Moderate | Superior | Average |
| Source transparency | Partial | Full | Full | Partial |
Source: Original analysis based on provider feature disclosures and industry reviews.
Advanced tips: automate topic monitoring with custom feeds, set up alerts for key industry events, and integrate AI outputs with internal dashboards for seamless, actionable insights.
The future of AI-generated news: Brave new world or cautionary tale?
Five scenarios for the next decade of AI journalism
Peering into the next decade, the trajectory of AI-generated daily news splits into five plausible scenarios:
- The utopia: Automation frees humans for investigative and creative work, while AI delivers facts—clean, fast, and fair.
- The dystopia: Deepfakes, bias, and misinformation run rampant as regulation lags behind tech advances.
- The middle path: Human-AI hybrid newsrooms set ethical standards, transparency improves, but trust remains fragile.
- Decentralized AI news: Open-source models empower communities to generate and audit their own content.
- Subscription-only human news: Elite outlets pivot to paid, human-only journalism for a niche market.
- Hybrid collectives: Journalists, technologists, and readers co-create algorithmic news, blending strengths.
Unconventional uses for AI-generated daily news:
- Crisis management dashboards for emergency responders
- Automated compliance monitoring in regulated industries
- Sentiment analysis for political campaigns
- Supply chain risk alerts for global businesses
- Curriculum updates for educators
- Cultural trendspotting for entertainment producers
Platforms like newsnest.ai have outsized influence in shaping these futures—through their choices on transparency, customization, and ethics, they set the tone for an industry in flux.
What readers can do now: Staying informed, critical, and empowered
If one lesson stands out, it’s this: in an age of algorithmic journalism, media literacy is non-negotiable. Readers must learn to interrogate, cross-check, and think critically about every headline.
Priority checklist for AI-generated daily news literacy:
- Always verify source credibility before sharing
- Familiarize yourself with common signs of automation
- Use multiple platforms to triangulate facts
- Stay current with AI news literacy resources
- Flag and report suspicious or erroneous content
- Participate in platform feedback and correction mechanisms
- Demand transparency from news providers
Symbolic photo: Reader engaged with AI-powered news, neon-lit headlines reflected in their eyes, evoking digital literacy and critical engagement.
The evolving relationship between humans and news is a two-way street: algorithms will shape what you see, but your choices, skepticism, and feedback will shape the algorithms. Stay sharp, stay curious, and never stop asking: who—or what—is telling you the story?
Appendix: Key terms and resources
AI news glossary: The essential definitions
When AI generates false or unsubstantiated information, eroding trust in news feeds.
Crafting precise instructions for AI to produce desired output, controlling style, tone, and focus.
Ongoing process where human editors review, correct, and retrain AI models to improve accuracy.
Deliberate attempt to trick AI into producing misleading or harmful content via manipulated inputs.
Techniques used to identify and reduce prejudice in AI-generated content.
Tools to spot AI-manipulated images or videos posing as authentic news.
Human review process for AI outputs, ensuring accuracy and legal compliance.
Practice of disclosing data origins, model use, and editorial interventions in AI news.
AI system that tailors newsfeeds based on user preferences and behavior data.
Rapid spread of false or misleading news amplified by automated systems.
Further reading and references
For a deeper dive into the technology, ethics, and practice of AI in journalism, consult:
- Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2025
- Pew Research Center, April 2024
- JournalismAI, 2023
- IBM Insights on AI in Journalism, 2024
- newsnest.ai — a resource for exploring and experimenting with AI-powered news generation
Footnotes
Ready to revolutionize your news production?
Join leading publishers who trust NewsNest.ai for instant, quality news content
More Articles
Discover more topics from AI-powered news generator
How AI-Generated Content Syndication Is Reshaping Digital Publishing
AI-generated content syndication is reshaping news. Discover the real risks, rewards, and what publishers must know to survive 2025’s media evolution.
How AI-Generated Content Marketing Is Reshaping Digital Strategies
AI-generated content marketing is rewriting the rules in 2025. Uncover myths, ROI, and expert strategies in this edgy, must-read deep dive. Act now—don’t get left behind.
Exploring AI-Generated Content Job Opportunities in Today’s Market
AI-generated content job opportunities are exploding. Discover hidden roles, key skills, and insider hacks to thrive in 2025’s new media landscape.
Exploring Ai-Generated Content Examples and Their Real-World Applications
AI-generated content examples are redefining media in 2025. Explore viral news, shocking case studies, and hidden risks in one definitive guide. Discover what's next.
How AI-Generated Business News Is Shaping the Future of Journalism
AI-generated business news is rewriting the rules. Discover hidden risks, real benefits, and the raw future of news. Are you ready for the new normal?
How AI-Generated Breaking News Is Changing the Media Landscape
AI-generated breaking news is shaking up journalism in 2025. Discover what’s real, what’s risky, and how to navigate the new media landscape—before it’s too late.
How AI-Generated Articles Are Shaping the Future of Content Creation
AI-generated articles are rewriting journalism. Discover the real impact, hidden pitfalls, and surprising opportunities. Read before you trust your next headline.
How AI-Generated Article Summaries Are Transforming News Consumption
AI-generated article summaries cut through the noise—discover the reality, risks, and rewards in 2025. Are you ready to trust AI with your news? Read now.
How AI-Driven News Production Is Transforming Journalism Today
AI-driven news production is rewriting journalism. Uncover the edgy, real-world impact, risks, and opportunities—plus what no one else will tell you.
How AI-Driven News Personalization Is Shaping the Future of Media
AI-driven news personalization is reshaping how you see the world. Discover the hidden impacts, risks, and real benefits—plus how to take control.
How AI-Driven News Feed Is Transforming the Way We Consume Information
AI-driven news feed is changing how we consume media. Discover the real impact, hidden risks, and how to seize control—before it controls you.
How AI-Driven News Apps Are Transforming the Way We Consume News
AI-driven news apps are rewriting headlines—and the rules. Discover the real impact, hidden risks, and how to outsmart the machines in 2025. Read now.